BBC+Survey+Questions

Of course this is science, because science can be defined as a way to understand all things surrounding us. And from it, we can classify on what kind of science is, depending on how we acquire knowledge from it. And basing and looking into these psychology questions, which its objective is to study and further understand how we humans think and behave based on our surroundings. One must also realize that from this kind of questions, one can gain knowledge from it or may also confirm existing knowledge already. And in looking further into the questions, I personally believe that these questions are valid in a sense that it is valid in confirming answers to these questions, which are based on limited variables that are controlled. But it could also cause problems in giving answers because one could just present answers that may not be reliable as one could just create answers that is not truthfully answered. //__**Which of these sayings best sums up your attitude to money?**__// I find this question really problematic because one could not just base his predictions on his future on what sayings he or she believes in as we control our own habits and one could not just be easily influenced by words alone. **__//Your great aunt Emily dies and leaves you £5000. What would you use it for?//__** I find this question valid as one could easily portray here how one will organize and spend any amount of money he or she is given with as we could see how one's spending habits work and then one could speculate on how his or her future will be affected as this factor alone can be a strong basis for seeing how one's future outcome will occur.

Find a good question (valid, not interpretable?, answerable?) in the natural sciences and in the human sciences. If you could, find a bad one for each as well. Your goal is to identify why one is better than the other. What allows one question, or field of science, to develop better understanding than the other? Is it method? Is it the knowledge itself? Let's discuss this.

Natural Sciences: Does life exist beyond our planet? (Astrobiology) Human Sciences: Can we, as humans, learn from our mistakes in the past events our history? (History)

I myself can say that the questions for Natural Sciences such as the one given above is better than questions of the Human Sciences based on different aspects of gaining and extending knowledge. In the Natural Sciences, despite given the fact there are some things changing the variables in studying it, the Natural Sciences can be further explored and delved into for it is more predictable given the basis of these variables whereas in the Human Sciences, the variables given to it despite being based on controlled variables and surroundings on a limited population (e.g. out of 100 people), its predictions are far more inaccurate because human behavior is on a constant change for we humans tend to behave in different ways and as we grow older, we all tend to not just physically but mentally and socially change on how we are affected by our surroundings.